Is it time to also use hematologic parameters for the diagnosis and prognosis of testicular torsion?

Is it time to also use hematologic parameters for the diagnosis and prognosis of testicular torsion?

Aderivaldo Cabral Dias Filho, Rodrigo Silveira Rocha

Urological Unit, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasilia, Brazil

Correspondence to: Aderivaldo Cabral Dias Filho. SHS Quadra 101 Area Especial s/n, 7o andar (Secretaria da Unidade de Urologia), Asa Sul, Brasília 70335-900, Distrito Federal, Brazil. Email:;

Comment on: Lee HY, Lim DG, Chung HS, et al. Mean platelet volume is the most valuable hematologic parameter in differentiating testicular torsion from epididymitis within the golden time. Transl Androl Urol 2022;11:1282-91.

Submitted Sep 09, 2022. Accepted for publication Oct 24, 2022.

doi: 10.21037/tau-22-603

In the article, Lee and collaborators (1) examine the role that hematologic parameters obtained from complete blood counts (CBCs) may play in the early diagnosis of testicular torsion (torsion) versus acute epididymo-orchitis (epididymitis) in acute scrotum patients. They retrospectively compared hemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet, neutrophil, lymphocyte and monocyte counts (PLC, NC, LC, MC), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil ratio, lymphocyte ratio, monocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) between 131 patients with torsion and 119 with epididymitis both before and after 6 hours of symptoms. They found that within 6 hours of symptoms, an MPV of 9.35 femtoliters (fL) was predictive of torsion (versus 8.53 fL in epididymitis), with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.855—with differences also being found between neutrophil count (7.72×103 versus 5.97×103/cells µL), neutrophil ratio (69.85% versus 59.33%), NLR (2.57 versus 5.17) and PLR (106.2% versus 141.37%). Even though WBC, neutrophil count, monocyte count and MPV were also predictive of orchiectomy on univariate analysis, they were eclipsed by symptom duration in their multivariate model.

This article is the most recent link in a chain of studies investigating whether parameters routinely obtained through an inexpensive CBC could improve the differential diagnosis of acute scrotum cases, and eventually anticipate the fate of the organ in testicular torsion patients. One of the first studies of this chain comes from Baskent, Turkey (2)—their 27th reference. Cicek et al. retrospectively compared 50 torsion patients with 50 controls, and found higher MPV among the former (8.3±1.2 versus 7.1±0.8 fL). Moreover, they observed that with a MPV cutoff value of 7.7 fL the AUC equaled 0.8 (sensitivity = 62%, specificity = 96%). Researchers from China (3)—reference 28 in the paper—compared 58 pediatric testicular torsion patients with 54 age-matched controls and uncovered that, in addition to symptom duration and magnitude of torsion, only MPV was predictive of orchiectomy (odds ratio =3.69).

These findings, however, were not reproduced in another 2015 Turkish study (4)—the 19th reference of the paper—that compared 75 torsion patients with 56 controls. Instead of MPV, they found that larger NLR (3.61 versus 1.82), PLR (137.7% versus 94.7%) and platelet counts (257.103 versus 190.103 plt/µL) were predictive of torsion. The use of a 2.95 NLR cutoff value resulted in a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 92% (ROC curves were provided as figures but we could not find the AUC values). Together with symptom duration, a higher NLR (mean 4.81 versus 2.72) was also predictive of testicular salvage in a Korean study (5) (the 7th reference in the article).

A more clinical valuable comparison was the subject of yet another retrospective Turkish study (6)—the article’s 12th reference. These workers compared CBC parameters between 51 torsion and 50 epididymitis patients, as well as with 52 controls, and found that although MPV did not discriminate between torsion and epididymitis patients, the median PLR was higher in epididymitis patients: 177 versus 110.7 (torsion) and 111.5 (controls), as also was the NLR: 5.5 versus 4.4 (torsion) and 2 (controls). MPV also failed to distinguish between torsion and epididymitis in a retrospective study conducted by Yucel and Ozlem Ilbey (7) (reference 13 in the paper). Instead, they observed that PLR (cutoff 135.58, AUC 74.1%), monocyte-to-eosinophil ratio (cutoff 4.5, AUC 79.3%) and above all NLR (cutoff 3.39, AUC 87.2%) were better at differentiating between torsion and epididymitis. Given these conflicting results, one would hope that a systematic review and meta-analysis could be able to shed some light on this issue. Zhu et al. (8) were able to retrieve retrospective case-control studies (four of them already mentioned in this comment) and concluded that MPV, PLR and NLR may be useful to distinguish between torsion and epididymitis, whereas leucocyte counts most likely are not.

At this point in time, we have amassed enough data to progress from hypothesis-generating to hypothesis-proving/refuting research. As it seems possible that the thrombotic, ischemic and inflammatory events that follow torsion are reflected in WBCs and platelet count and morphology, we should be able to prospectively determine the diagnostic (with respect to epididymitis) and prognostic (regarding testicular salvage) value of these rather unspecific (9) CBC parameters. Since surgical outcomes in torsion patients are heavily dependent upon early diagnosis, often made by non-urologists (10,11), we are particularly curious whether one or more of these hematologic parameters could improve accuracy to existing diagnostic tools, such as the TWIST (12) and BAL (13) scores.


Funding: None.


Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Andrology and Urology. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See:


  1. Lee HY, Lim DG, Chung HS, et al. Mean platelet volume is the most valuable hematologic parameter in differentiating testicular torsion from epididymitis within the golden time. Transl Androl Urol 2022;11:1282-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Cicek T, Togan T, Akbaba K, et al. The value of serum mean platelet volume in testicular torsion. J Int Med Res 2015;43:452-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. He M, Zhang W, Sun N. Can haematologic parameters be used to predict testicular viability in testicular torsion?. Andrologia 2019;51:e13357. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Güneş M, Umul M, Altok M, et al. Predictive role of hematologic parameters in testicular torsion. Korean J Urol 2015;56:324-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Jang JB, Ko YH, Choi JY, et al. Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Organ Salvage in Testicular Torsion with Marginal Diagnostic Delay. World J Mens Health 2019;37:99-104. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Bitkin A, Aydın M, Özgür BC, et al. Can haematologic parameters be used for differential diagnosis of testicular torsion and epididymitis? Andrologia 2018; [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Yucel C, Ozlem Ilbey Y. Predictive value of hematological parameters in testicular torsion: retrospective investigation of data from a high-volume tertiary care center. J Int Med Res 2019;47:730-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Zhu J, Song Y, Chen G, et al. Predictive value of haematologic parameters in diagnosis of testicular torsion: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrologia 2020;52:e13490. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Demirer Z, Uslu AU, Balta S. Letter to the editor: predictive value of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume in testicular torsion. Korean J Urol 2015;56:601-2.
  10. Dias AC. Presentation delay, misdiagnosis, inter-hospital transfer times and surgical outcomes in testicular torsion: analysis of statewide case series from central Brazil. Int Braz J Urol 2020;46:972-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Cabral Dias Filho A, Rincon Cintra da Cruz P, Zanettini Riccetto CL. Testicular Torsion Patients Should Be Manually Detorsed at Diagnosis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the Influence of Interhospital Transfer and Surgical Wait Times on Surgical Organ Salvage. Pediatr Emerg Care 2022;38:e936-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Barbosa JA, Tiseo BC, Barayan GA, et al. Development and initial validation of a scoring system to diagnose testicular torsion in children. J Urol 2013;189:1859-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Klinke M, Elrod J, Stiel C, et al. The BAL-Score Almost Perfectly Predicts Testicular Torsion in Children: A Two-Center Cohort Study. Front Pediatr 2020;8:601892. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Cabral Dias Filho A, Rocha RS. Is it time to also use hematologic parameters for the diagnosis and prognosis of testicular torsion? Transl Androl Urol 2022;11(10):1368-1370. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-603

Download Citation