The need to improve TURB: a diagnostic and therapeutic fundamental first step in the disease’s management

The need to improve TURB: a diagnostic and therapeutic fundamental first step in the disease’s management

Marco Moschini1, Florian Roghmann2, Evanguelos Xylinas3; on behalf of the EAU Young Academic Urologists—Urothelial Cancer Working party

1Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland; 2Department of Urology, Marien Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany; 3Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France

Correspondence to: Marco Moschini, MD, PhD. Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, 6004 Luzern, Switzerland. Email:

Submitted Jul 06, 2018. Accepted for publication Aug 09, 2018.

doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.29

Urinary bladder cancer (BCa) accounts for about 7% of all new cancers in the USA with 81,190 estimated new cases and 17,240 deaths in 2018 (1). Approximately 75% of the new diagnoses BCa will be non-muscle-invasive BCa (NMIBC) (2) affected by disease recurrence and progression rates of approximately 60% and 20%, respectively (3). In every new diagnosed BCa, transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) represents a fundamental diagnostic/staging tool and the gold standard treatment followed with adjuvant intravesical chemo- or immunotherapy for NMIBC (2). A well performed TURB is pivotal in the diagnostic and therapeutic processes, since it has been confirmed that the absence of detrusor muscle in the specimen is associated with a significant increased risk of residual disease, disease recurrence and tumor understaging (4).

Several surgical and technical aspects need to be highlighted for the correct disease management. The main goal of a well-executed TURB is to complete the resection, a goal that can be achieved either with en-bloc or fractioned resection (5). The advantage of the resection in fraction is to separate the exophytic part of the tumor and to provide enough information regarding the vertical and the horizontal extent of the tumor. On the other hand, an en-bloc technique can be feasible in exophytic tumors and provide a high quality of the specimen resected (5). Both techniques are feasible and depend mainly on the characteristics of the tumor and on the experience of the surgeon. Similarly, both monopolar and bipolar resection techniques are validated, whereas there is a controversy on which one is the most effective device (6).

Recently, the widespread of new methods of tumor visualization such as photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) and narrow band imaging (NBI) represent a useful tool for urologists. These techniques have shown excellent results in reducing disease recurrence rates and seem particularly effective in the detection of carcinoma in situ. However, with time their effect on reducing disease progression and cancer-specific mortality have to be proved (7). Another decisive diagnostic and therapeutic step is represented by the second look TURB to diagnose and if possible remove residual tumor in high-risk NMIBC (8). Residual tumor was found in 17–67% of patients in a recently metanalyses analyzing 8,409 patients affected by high risk NMIBC (8).

Several parameters permit to stratify risk of disease recurrence and progression of patients. Substaging groups classification have been proposed by EORTC (9) and CUETO (10) to predict outcomes and optimize treatments of NMIBC. These models include pathological features at TURB such as: number of tumors, tumor diameter, recurrence rate, T stage, grading and presence of concomitant carcinoma in situ. However, other elements need to be considered by urologists to individualize the best therapeutic options, such as: gender, smoking status and presence of histological variants. The impact of gender on pathological features and outcomes have been examined demonstrating a reduced risk of developing BCa in females even though female patients that have developed BCa show worse disease recurrence and progression rates (11). Smoking status is a well-known risk factor for the BCa development but has also an important role in defining recurrence and progression rate. Urologists should counsel active smoker diagnosed with BCa to quit smoking habits as an active part of the therapeutic management (12). Finally, histological variants at TURB, although affected by poor concordance rate compared to RC (13) have to be considered in the therapeutic management of BCa and should be considered before deciding to opt for either a conservative or a more aggressive strategy (14).

Regarding the approach after a well performed TURB, the use of a single instillation of chemotherapy should be recommended in all patients harboring low- or intermediate-risk NMIBC. The instillation should be delivered within 24 hours and epirubicin or mitomycin as well as gemcitabine seem effective in reducing recurrence rates (although no evidence exists with regards to disease progression) (15,16). In case of perforation, extensive resection or persistent hematuria, the single instillation should be avoided due to the risk of incurring in severe complications. On the other hand, not all the tumors need to be treated since some selected cases might be controlled with active surveillance (17).

Finally, another important question is when to opt for an early cystectomy since patients progressing into a muscle-invasive disease after a prior history of NMIBC have been shown to have worse survival outcomes than those de novo muscle-invasive bladder cancer (18). New markers are needed to understand which tumors harbor the most adverse prognoses and therefore might need an aggressive disease management. Although the therapy with BCG composed by induction and maintenance for intermediate and high-risk NMIBC is effective with a level of evidence 1a in reducing disease recurrence and progression, new device assisted intravesical chemotherapy has been proposed and might find a role in the treatment of patients who failed BCG and decline RC (2,19). Furthermore, clinical trials are evaluating the emerging role of immune check point inhibitors also in the NMIBC setting. Considering the follow up schemes of NMIBC patients, data are urgently requested to understand the correct timing of CT-scan, cystoscopy and cytology as most of the data are based on historical retrospective series. Moreover, emergent non-invasive biomarkers have been proposed but none has reached daily practice in order to replace the more invasive but gold standard cystoscopy (20).




Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol 2017;71:447-61. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Herr HW. Tumor progression and survival of patients with high grade, noninvasive papillary (TaG3) bladder tumors: 15-year outcome. J Urol 2000;163:60-1; discussion 61-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Mariappan P, Zachou A, Grigor KM. Edinburgh Uro-Oncology Group. Detrusor muscle in the first, apparently complete transurethral resection of bladder tumour specimen is a surrogate marker of resection quality, predicts risk of early recurrence, and is dependent on operator experience. Eur Urol 2010;57:843-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Kramer MW, Altieri V, Hurle R, et al. Current Evidence of Transurethral En-bloc Resection of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2017;3:567-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Venkatramani V, Panda A, Manojkumar R, et al. Monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a single center, parallel arm, randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2014;191:1703-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Chou R, Selph S, Buckley DI, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Fluorescent Versus White Light Cystoscopy for Initial Diagnosis or Surveillance of Bladder Cancer on Clinical Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol 2017;197:548-58. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Cumberbatch MGK, Foerster B, Catto JWF, et al. Repeat Transurethral Resection in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2018;73:925-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 2006;49:466-5; discussion 475-7.
  10. Fernandez-Gomez J, Madero R, Solsona E, et al. Predicting nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer recurrence and progression in patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin: the CUETO scoring model. J Urol 2009;182:2195-203. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Lucca I, Klatte T, Fajkovic H, et al. Gender differences in incidence and outcomes of urothelial and kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2015;12:653. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Rink M, Crivelli JJ, Shariat SF, et al. Smoking and Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review of Risk and Outcomes. Eur Urol Focus 2015;1:17-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Moschini M, Shariat SF, Freschi M, et al. Is transurethral resection alone enough for the diagnosis of histological variants? A single-center study. Urol Oncol 2017;35:528.e1-528.e5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Moschini M, D'Andrea D, Korn S, et al. Characteristics and clinical significance of histological variants of bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2017;14:651-68. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Bosschieter J, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, van Ginkel T, et al. Value of an Immediate Intravesical Instillation of Mitomycin C in Patients with Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Multicentre Randomised Study in 2243 patients. Eur Urol 2018;73:226-32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Messing EM, Tangen CM, Lerner SP, et al. Effect of Intravesical Instillation of Gemcitabine vs Saline Immediately Following Resection of Suspected Low-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer on Tumor Recurrence: SWOG S0337 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018;319:1880-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Hurle R, Lazzeri M, Vanni E, et al. Active Surveillance for Low Risk Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Confirmatory and Resource Consumption Study from the BIAS Project. J Urol 2018;199:401-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Moschini M, Sharma V, Dell'oglio P, et al. Comparing long-term outcomes of primary and progressive carcinoma invading bladder muscle after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2016;117:604-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Arends TJ, Nativ O, Maffezzini M, et al. Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Intravesical Chemohyperthermia with Mitomycin C Versus bacillus Calmette-Guérin for Adjuvant Treatment of Patients with Intermediate- and High-risk Non-Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2016;69:1046-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Soria F, Droller MJ, Lotan Y, et al. An up-to-date catalog of available urinary biomarkers for the surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2018;36:1981-95. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Moschini M, Roghmann F, Xylinas E; on behalf of the EAU Young Academic Urologists—Urothelial Cancer Working party. The need to improve TURB: a diagnostic and therapeutic fundamental first step in the disease’s management. Transl Androl Urol 2019;8(1):2-4. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.29