Challenging the dogma of simultaneous resection of bladder tumor and benign prostate
Editorial

Challenging the dogma of simultaneous resection of bladder tumor and benign prostate

Matvey Tsivian1, Alexander Tsivian2

1Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA;2Department of Urologic Surgery, The E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon and Sackler School of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Correspondence to: Alexander Tsivian. Department of Urologic Surgery, The E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon and Sackler School of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Email: atsivian@hotmail.com.

Provenance: This is an Editorial commissioned by Section Editor Xiao Li (Department of Urology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China).

Comment on: Dellabella M, Branchi A, Gasparri L, et al. Oncological safety and quality of life in men undergoing simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder tumor and prostate: results from a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol 2018;36:1629-34.


Submitted Jul 29, 2018. Accepted for publication Aug 07, 2018.

doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.08


Dellabella and colleagues (1) reported the results of a randomized trial evaluating oncological and functional outcomes of combining transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) with resection of prostate (TURP) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

There are definitely some weaknesses in this report. First, the participants were not blinded to the allocation and that may have introduced bias. Second, no power analysis for this trial is reported in the manuscript thus making it possible for this just to be an underpowered analysis that failed to detect a difference between the groups simply due to low numbers of participants. Furthermore, it appears that no intravesical chemotherapy was administered in either group (with understandable concerns of performing this in a TURP setting). With these limitations in mind, however, the results of this study are important for several reasons.

While this is not a rare scenario in clinical practice, the urologic community still maintain some hesitancy regarding combining the two procedures secondary to concerns for oncologic safety. This represents a surgical dogma originated decades ago (2), and surgical dogmata are difficult to overcome at times. Dellabella et al. (1) challenge this concept in a randomized trial. Their result show no apparent deleterious impact of concomitant TURP on recurrence of bladder cancer (1) encouraging the community not to negate the benefits of quality of life for men with symptomatic BPH while treating their bladder cancer.

In addition, while several meta-analyses on the topic were published reviewing retrospective data (3-5), randomized prospective trial data are lacking. In fact, Dellabella et al. (1) augment the findings of a previously reported randomized prospective study by Singh et al. (6) reaching similar conclusions. With the limitations of these studies in mind, there is still an unmet need in more data on the subject to reach definitive conclusions.

While the jury is still out on determining definitively the safety of combined TURBT and TURP, the authors reassure us that is appears to be safe and we share their experience (7). Without a doubt performing a TURP will likely enhance the patient’s quality of life as reported in this study (1) and avoid him an additional trip to the operating room while it may preclude the administration of intravesical chemotherapy. These considerations have to be balanced and discussed with the patient.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

  1. Dellabella M, Branchi A, Gasparri L, et al. Oncological safety and quality of life in men undergoing simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder tumor and prostate: results from a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol 2018;36:1629-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Kiefer JH. Bladder tumor recurrence in the urethra: a warning. J Urol 1953;69:652-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Li S, Zeng XT, Ruan XL, et al. Simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder cancer and prostate may reduce recurrence rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 2012;4:685-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Luo S, Lin Y, Zhang W. Does simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder tumor and prostate affect the recurrence of bladder tumor? A meta-analysis. J Endourol 2011;25:291-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Picozzi SC, Ricci C, Gaeta M, et al. Is it oncologically safe performing simultaneous transurethral resection of the bladder and prostate? A meta-analysis on 1,234 patients. Int Urol Nephrol 2012;44:1325-33. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Singh V, Sinha RJ, Sankhwar SN. Outcome of simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder tumor and transurethral resection of the prostate in comparison with the procedures in two separate sittings in patients with bladder tumor and urodynamically proven bladder outflow obstruction. J Endourol 2009;23:2007-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Tsivian A, Shtricker A, Sidi AA. Simultaneous transurethral resection of bladder tumor and benign prostatic hyperplasia: hazardous or a safe timesaver? J Urol 2003;170:2241-3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Tsivian M, Tsivian A. Challenging the dogma of simultaneous resection of bladder tumor and benign prostate. Transl Androl Urol 2018;7(Suppl 6):S756-S757. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.08

Download Citation